Sebastian Botzem and Judith Hesselmann have published a new article in “Leviathan – Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft”. The German text “Gralshüter des Ordoliberalismus?” analyzes the compositon and theoretical orientation of the German Council of Economic Experts, an official advisory board to the federal government. Sebastian and Judith find that the council follows the ideological narrowing that prevails with the economics disciplin. Moreover, recently, the council members have increased their networking activities towards ordoliberal think tanks. The article can be found here.
Sebastian Botzem and Natalia Besedovsky have published a chapter on finance as an emerging transnational field in the edited volume “Netzwerke in gesellschaftlichen Feldern” (networks in societal fields). The volume is edited by Jan Fuhse and Karoline Krenn and was published by Springer VS. In their contribution, Natalia and Sebastian analyze the network configuration and the institutionalization of organizational relations within finance between 2003 and 2013 with the help of our GloFIELD database. They find that financial organizations are increasing their interrelations in order to allow for exchange of information and coordination. Moreover professional associations, knowledge providing organizations and bodies of private self-regulation are increasingly forming the core of the transnational financial field. The publication summarizes some of the core findings of the research project on the global financial elite and can be purchased online.
Marcus Wolf has published an article on “Behavioral economics and the making of financial literacy” in the latest issue of Economic Sociology – The European Electronic Newsletter. This issue is dedicated to “The Laws of Economics” and is the second issue edited by Olivier Godechot (Science Po). In his contribution, Marcus links the ascent of financial lietarcy as political project to the rise of behavioral accounts within the field of economics. By doing so, he connects the sociology of professions and the histroy of economic ideas in order to shed light on the impressive academic and political career of financial literacy as alleged solution to financial market imbalances. Particulary, Marcus argues that the idea of financial literacy has served as a coalition magnet and aims at further deepening the financialization of the everyday life through discoursively disapproving “out-of-date” financial behavior.
Natalia Besedovsky published an article in Socio-Economic Review (currently as „advance access“ paper). Using the case of Moody’s, a major credit rating agency, her article “Financialization as calculative practice (…)” traces a fundamental paradigm shift in rating practices since the late 1980s. These innovations were driven by new calculative models, new kinds of analysts (so-called ‘quants’), and a profit-oriented organizational culture at Moody’s, all shaped by an increasingly financialized context. By studying credit rating agencies’ historical and current methodological publications and interviewing rating analysts, Natalia shows that the rating innovations of the 1980s and 1990s entail an entirely different set of epistemological assumptions about the calculability and predictability of the future, representing a fundamental paradigm shift in calculating and defining credit risk. In this framework, risk is not a threat that must be minimized, but a neutral variable that can be calculated, managed and used to generate profits. This new culture of credit risk assessment enabled the emergence and exponential growth of structured finance markets, fueling a culture of high-risk investments. The article contributes to the literature on financialization by arguing that financialization occurs both at the level of organizational culture and calculative practices.
Sebastian Botzem, together with Sigrid Quack (University Duisburg-Essen) and Solomon Zori (Rotterdam School of Management), published an article on the adoption of international accounting standards in Africa in the journal Global Policy.
Their article “International Accounting Standards in Africa: Selective Recursivity for the ‘Happy Few?” is part of the current issue´s special section on “Recursivity in Transnational Governance” edited by Olga Malets and Sigrid Quack. The article discusses the lack of participation of African stakeholders in the standard-setting process as well as the conceptual mismatch between the standard-setter’s objectives on the one hand and the socio-economic, cultural and political conditions in many African countries.
Our colleague Marcus Wolf has contributed to the new blog of the German Association of Political Science (DVPW) working group on orders of violence (Gewaltordnungen). His blog post “Die symbolische Gewalt der Schulden” raises the question whether and under which circumstances debt relations can be interpreted as manifestations of symbolic violence. Marcus argues that in a historical perspective, the morality of debt has often led to forms of direct or indirect violence against debtors, for instance in the case of debtor´s prisons. Nowadys, under the regime of debt-driven consumption, the symbolic violence of debt is much more inscribed in a new governmentality of financialization and is expressed in new attributions of responsibilities and in hidden power relations.
The University of Innsbruck interviewed Leonhard Dobusch who has co-authored an article on the financialization of the European real estate sector with Sebastian Botzem. The article “Financialization as strategy: Accounting for inter-organizational value creation in the European real estate industry” will be published soon in “Accounting, Organizations and Society” and is already available online. In the brief interview (in German language), Leonhard presents core findings of the study that traces the stream of fees and the role of intermediaries in financialized real estate. The authors argue for a re-regulation of financial markets based on the issue of fees. The interview can be found here.
Sebastian Möller has written a short report on the spread of so-called LOBO (ledender option – borrower option) loans among British local authorities for SPERI comment, the blog of the Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute (SPERI). In his contribution, “Financializing town halls: Local councils, LOBO loans and the derivatives markets”, Sebastian briefly introduces this new type of market debt that became quite popular among UK city treasurers prior to the crisis. He describes how a complex network of different public and private actors including new intermediaries, such as treasury management advisors and brokers, facilitated the spread of LOBO loans. Contrary to experiences made by many continental local governements, in the British case the derivative character of this new financial instrumentwas much more hidden, since LOBOs constitute a form of embedded derivatives. In his PhD research project, Sebastian explores the financialization of municipal debt management across Europe.
Sebastian Botzem and Leonhard Dobusch have published a new article on the financialization of the European real estate sector in Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS). The article “Financialization as strategy: Accounting for inter-organizational value creation in the European real estate industry” is now online available.
Abstract: Financialization – the increasing relevance of financial markets, financial actors and financial logics – and the related rise of originate-to-distribute-cycles in the mortgage industry have been considered key explanations for the emergence of financial crises. Analyzing a case study in the European real estate industry, we show how actors strategically manage inter-organizational relations and take advantage of rising asset prices, through refinancing on the basis of loan-to-value even before the originate-to-distribute-cycle of the mortgage industry unfolds. Valuation and accounting are core practices of financialized business models that evolve around management fees, which serve as value carriers and bring potential future profits into the present. Auditing also plays a role as it legitimizes these business activities and facilitates jurisdictional arbitrage. We contribute to the accounting literature by explaining how the strategic configuration of a valuation-accounting nexus leads to organizational short-termism and rewards unsustainable business activities in the real estate industry.
Sebastian Möller has written a new blog post for “Manchester Capitalism: A View From The North”. In his contribution “Mapping & Understanding the Networked Character of Finance”, he summarizes the “Networks in Finance Workshop” held last December in Manchester. This workshop was organized by Adam Leaver and Daniel Tischer from the Manchester Business School. On this occasion, scholars from different fields of study have discussed the roles of networks in different areas of finance and the value of network analysis for understanding ongoing processes and dynamics. At this workshop, also Sebastian Botzem presented a paper co-authored by Natalia Besedovsky on the reconfiguration of the global financial elite. The blog post provides a brief overview of the different projects presented in Manchester and sketches out some routes for further research.
Sebastian Möller and Marcus Wolf have written a report on the Young Scholars Workshop on Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Finance for the German social science blog soziopolis. The workshop was organized by our research group in September at the University of Bremen with kind support by the Center for Transnational Studies (ZenTra) and the Foundation of the University of Bremen. In their contribution, Marcus and Sebastian summarize the keynote talks by Eleni Tsingou, Lucia Quaglia, and Phil Mader and discuss strenghts and downsides of the interdisciplinary study of financial market developments. There is also a blog post in English language on socializing finance. Previously, Marcus and Sebastian already have published blog posts on soziopolis on the Debt Trails Workshop in Budapest and the symposium on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the Institute for Intercultural & International Studies.
Möller, Sebastian & Wolf, Marcus (2016): Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf das Finanzwesen (Report on the Young Scholars Workshop). Soziopolis, 10.11.2016.
Sebastian Botzem and Marcus Wolf have written a comment on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) that is currently negotiated between the United States and the EU for the IMPULSE blog of Bremen University. In their comment, Sebastian and Marcus argue that TTIP is a potential threat for democracy on both sides of the North Atlantic. In particular, regulatory cooperation, prioritization of investor´s interests, and private investor-to-state dispute settlement bodies could undermine democratic decison-making. Thus, TTIP should be discussed much more as a democracy issue rather than as a technical free trade agreement. The blog entry goes back to a public panel discussion on TTIP organized by the research group earlier this autumn in Bremen.
Read the blog entry (in German language) here.
An adio- and video-file of the panel discussion can be found here.
Prof. Sebastian Botzem reported on the International Accounting Standards Board. International Financial Reporting Standards define the rules for corporate accounting and are set by a private standard setter: the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The EU has no formal role in developing these standards, but de facto endorses them ex post. This raises questions with regard to the overrepresentation of commercial interests in accounting regulation and the need to debate a stronger role not only for civil society actors but also for public entities such as regulators.
You may find more infomation at the European Parliament`s website.
A video stream of the workshop is provided here.